Coinbase contends the SEC’s interpretation of what constitutes a security is dangerously broad and insupportable. In the exchange’s view, only assets conferring explicit financial rights or a stake in a business should be considered securities.
The popular crypto exchange Coinbase Global Inc (NASDAQ: COIN) is locked in a major legal battle with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that could have far-reaching consequences for digital asset regulation. The central challenge is whether certain cryptocurrencies available on Coinbase’s platform should be regulated as securities. The SEC considers assets such as Bitcoin to be investment contracts subject to its jurisdiction. However, the exchange disagrees, claiming that the SEC is overstepping its authority.
Crypto Exchange Coinbase Challenges the SEC’s Broad Interpretation
The conflict came to a head when Coinbase planned to launch a lending program allowing users to earn interest on crypto holdings. The SEC threatened legal action to block the program, forcing it to abandon the plans. The exchange fired back by filing a lawsuit seeking to restrain the SEC from overregulating its activities.
Coinbase contends the SEC’s interpretation of what constitutes a security is dangerously broad and insupportable. In the exchange’s view, only assets conferring explicit financial rights or a stake in a business should be considered securities. However, the SEC is trying to regard any enterprise with a hope of gain as a security. In the filing, the crypto exchange stated:
“The SEC’s authority is limited to securities transactions. Not every parting of capital with a hope of gain qualifies, and trades over Coinbase are only securities transactions if they involve “investment contracts. The transactions at issue here do not. As the SEC now would have it, an investment contract exists if someone (1) parts with capital (2) expects that her purchase will increase in value.”
Coinbase strengthens its argument by drawing a parallel: If cryptocurrencies were to be classified as securities, then consider the scenario where a painter announces an upcoming art exhibition in a gallery. In such a case, many individuals will attempt to purchase the artwork in anticipation of its value increasing when it’s showcased. If this scenario does not qualify as an investment contract, Coinbase contends that cryptocurrencies should not be categorized as such. The crypto exchange argues that further congressional action is needed to authorize SEC oversight of crypto trading. Without it, the SEC risks overstepping the authority granted to it by lawmakers.
The dispute crystallizes the larger debate around crypto regulation. How digital assets are classified legally determines what rules and agencies govern them. Securities face strict disclosure and registration requirements. Commodities and currencies are subject to different bodies of regulation. The exchange worries that the SEC’s aggressive posture if upheld by the courts, would allow it to regulate numerous assets as securities. This would place cryptocurrencies in the same category as stocks, rather than being treated as mediums of exchange or commodities.
Implications and Stakes: The Future of Crypto Regulation
The resolution of this issue is critical for investors and companies operating in the cryptocurrency space. A court decision in favor of the SEC could result in a flood of new registration and compliance costs, which some fear will stifle innovation. Others argue that more safeguards are required to protect investors. For the time being, the situation remains unresolved. However, the outcome will be significant to the SEC’s ability to regulate cryptocurrency.
Temitope is a writer with more than four years of experience writing across various niches. He has a special interest in the fintech and blockchain spaces and enjoy writing articles in those areas. He holds bachelor’s and master’s degrees in linguistics. When not writing, he trades forex and plays video games.
