Saturday, November 23, 2024
Home > Exchanges > British Bank Natwest Implements New Limits on Cryptocurrency Payments to Combat UK Crypto Scams – Bitcoin News

British Bank Natwest Implements New Limits on Cryptocurrency Payments to Combat UK Crypto Scams – Bitcoin News

On March 14, 2023, the U.K.-based bank Natwest Group announced new limits on cryptocurrency payments, citing crypto scams that cost U.K. consumers £329 million annually. The limit imposed on crypto exchanges is £1,000 daily ($1,215), with a 30-day limit of £5,000 ($6,077).

Natwest’s Cautious Approach Towards Crypto Assets Prompts Another Transfer Limit

Amid the banking sector rout in the United States following the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and its subsidiary, Silicon Valley Bank U.K. Ltd., the Edinburgh-based financial institution Natwest is limiting cryptocurrency payments. Natwest, however, cites cryptocurrency scams in the United Kingdom that cost consumers £329 million ($399 million) annually as the reason for the limit. The bank’s notice also indicates that men over the age of 35 are “most at risk” of such scams.

Natwest’s press release, published on Tuesday, details that “cryptocurrency investments are often made through legitimate exchange platforms.” The British banks added that these “websites let customers buy, sell or exchange cryptocurrencies for other digital currency or traditional currency.” Natwest also emphasizes that, in addition to men over the age of 35, criminals are using the “cost-of-living crisis” to entice investors with the promise of high returns.”

“You should always have sole control of your cryptocurrency wallet and nobody else should have access,” noted Stuart Skinner, head of Natwest’s fraud protection unit. “If you didn’t set the wallet up yourself or can’t access the money then this is likely to be a scam. We have seen an increase in the number of scams using cryptocurrency exchanges and we are acting to protect our customers.”

This is not the first time Natwest has limited transfers to cryptocurrency exchanges. The bank set a temporary limit in June 2021, and the following month, it specifically blocked payments to Binance, citing the heightened risk of cryptocurrency scams. Natwest has often categorized cryptocurrency assets as “high risk” in the past. In April 2021, just before the first limit was imposed, a Natwest risk manager said: “We have no appetite for dealing with customers” who transact with cryptocurrencies.

Tags in this story
Binance, cautious approach, collapse, consumer protection, Cryptocurrency Assets, cryptocurrency exchanges, Cryptocurrency Payments, Customers, Digital Currency, Edinburgh, enticement, Financial Institutions, fraud protection, high returns, high risk, increased risk, Investors, legitimate exchange platforms, men over 35, Money Laundering, Natwest Bank, Natwest Banking, Natwest Group, online security, past actions, press release, risk management, safety measures, Scams, Silicon Valley Bank, Silicon Valley Bank UK Ltd, Stuart Skinner, subsidiary, temporary limit, traditional currency, transfers, UK crypto scams, United States, wallet control

What do you think about Natwest limiting crypto payments to digital currency exchanges? Share your thoughts about this subject in the comments section below.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman is the News Lead at Bitcoin.com News and a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open-source code, and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 6,000 articles for Bitcoin.com News about the disruptive protocols emerging today.




Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, Alex Yeung / Shutterstock.com

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.



Source